Ph.D. Tezi Görüntüleme | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: This research aimed to compare various sampling methods used in forest inventory for estimation of success and cost. The data were collected from even-aged Pinus brutia -Pinus nigra stands in Burhaniye and from uneven-aged Abies nordmanniana subsp. bornmulleriana - Pinus sylvestris stands in Ayancık.Simple Random, Systematic, Stratified, Cluster, Angle Count and Six Tree sampling methods were used. Three sample sizes (400, 600 and 800 m2) for fixed plot sizesampling methods and five coefficient of variations for varying plot size sampling methods were took into account. Four sampling errors (5, 10, 15 and 20%) which are commonlyused in forest inventory were also considered. Totally 435 sampling designs were developed by using various sampling methods, different sample plot sizes (or coefficient ofvariations) and different sampling errors. These designs were compared for power of basal area estimation by using absolute percent bias and compared for cost by using totalsampling costs. Two optimization models, one of which minimizes the sampling cost for a given sampling error and the other minimizes sampling error for fixed budget, were alsosolved for various strategies. According to the research results, Angle Count Sampling for even-aged stands andTwo-Stage Cluster Sampling for uneven-aged stands were efficient methods. In terms of sampling cost it was the sample plot size of 600 m2 or 800 m2 were efficient for even-agedstands, while the sample plot size of 600 m2 was effective for uneven-aged stands. According to the validity check of the results by using the records of General Directorateof Forestry, the results are favorable. The study also generated some equations for calculating the time required to measure the diameter.Key Words: Timber Inventory, Sampling Methods, Sampling Cost, Sampling Efficiency |